Search
  • Dr. Nasir Shaikh

Planned Parenthood Murder Inc. Says Abstinence Will Not Work - They Are Wrong

Updated: Feb 2

11/6/2019


Abstinence Only Until Marriage does not work! Isn’t this the mantra we have heard Ad nauseam from Planned Parenthood Murder Inc., DemoKKKrats, progressives and the Left for years. This includes their so-called experts in childhood psychology, social psychologists, health education teachers, sex-ed studies and thousands of like minded progressive school board administrators. Now add Hollywood, TV and the movie industry along with the Alt-Left, MSM and DemoKKKratic State Party controlled media constantly repeating “Abstinence Does Not Work” along with involvement of academia at our colleges and universities who are pushing this treatise as well.


The only groups pushing against this propaganda and countering with their own slogan “Abstinence DOES Work” are religious institutions which include churches, synagogues, mosques and temples. It should be noted the first two are losing this battle as their message is being drowned out in churches and synagogues due to numerous reasons as listed above.

However; that is not the case in mosques and Hindu temples. Mind you, sex education is not taught in mosques or temples but instilling the culture as well as religious teachings from very early on in childhood that the concept of sex before marriage is immoral. This is backed up by families in traditional marriages with a mother and father figure teaching and inculcating the concept that sex before marriage is unacceptable, immoral and a grave sin in the eyes of God. Conservative Republicans who are Christians, Muslims and Jews would call these family values. DemoKKKrats, Progressives, Leftists, Academic Elitists, Main Stream Media, Atheists and Hollywood Hypocrites call these values extreme, bigoted and sexaphobic.


The Left and their academic acolytes will point to numerous studies conducted by supposedly distinguished social scientists, their papers published in peer reviewed journals touting the folly, ridiculousness and stupidity of implementing abstinence only policies. Let me point out a fairly large study to illustrate my case.


It is a review published in the Journal of Adolescent Health. It had thirteen alleged experts in the field of adolescent sexuality research and policy. One of the researchers was Laura Lindberg who is a researcher at the Left leaning Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute was formed to study, educate, indoctrinate and advance sexual reproductive health rights. They are also at the forefront of the Pro Murder Abortion policies advocated by Pro-Murder Pro-Choice groups like Planned Parenthood Murder Inc. These thirteen people were tasked with reviewing United States sexuality education policies as well as programs scientific evidence which had been gathered over many decades. The conclusion they arrived at was no different than previous ones. These so called “research” experts actually come to the conclusion that abstinence only until marriage (and yes folks they actually have an acronym for this, it’s AOUM) causes severe harm and detriment to adolescents. They also came to the stunning conclusion that even more importance should be placed on teaching these impressionable young children by investing even more explicitly sexual education material over teaching AOUM. Their insane reasoning was AOUM based teaching stigmatizes children and teaching AOUM programs was unethical, bigoted and may even be illegal.


So let me get this straight. I want to follow their biased, insane and flawed logic to its conclusion. They are actually trying to tell American parents the research shows teaching young impressionable boys and girls, these young adolescents, that it is ok to experiment with their sexuality, promiscuity is acceptable and having sex prior to marriage, if that is what they decide to do, then make sure they utilize condoms or various other forms of birth control. This is not stigmatizing to children at all they conclude! This is not unethical at all they conclude! However teaching and practicing AOUM is reprehensible, stigmatizing and unethical!


Laura Lindberg states “While sexual abstinence can be a healthy choice for some adolescents, abstinence only until marriage programs are highly problematic. These programs withhold important sexual health knowledge and provide medically inaccurate information that compromises young people’s healthy sexual development.” Another self described expert at the Institute, Megan Donovan stated, “Young people have a right to complete and accurate information to support their healthy sexual development.”


This is the problem right there. Summed up by these two Leftists. You are having adults telling impressionable young children it is ok to experiment with your sexuality prior to marriage. Have sex before you are married! Sure if you want to try something, go for it and oh by the way here are some things you can do to protect yourself. Use a condom, take a pill! If by chance you get an STD or STI you can go to a doctor. Oh, and girls If you happen to get pregnant, don’t worry you can always get an abortion. Oh, and guys, if you do get a girl pregnant its ok for you to not stick around!


Did you you know in 7 states and in District ofColumbia a girl under the age of 18 can get an abortion without notifying parents. Health care personnel do not have to tell her parents if she doesn’t want to. Now if she is in school and needs to take a Tylenol because she has a headache, parents have to fill out forms in triplicate and get a doctors note.


I could cite hundreds of other studies and articles from researchers over the last thirty years which basically state the same ideology and come to similar conclusions. I intend to 100% refute all their claims and my findings prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only does AOUM teaching work but it is 99.99% effectively being taught in homes all across America.

The illegitimacy birthrate of girls in families in my study where AOUM is discussed by both parents is ZERO PERCENT. ZERO PERCENT FOLKS! Has that sunk in yet? The abortion rate for girls from my data show where AOUM is discussed in families is ZERO PERCENT. The percentage of unmarried girls who had babies in these families is ZERO PERCENT. My findings showed ZERO PERCENT teenage pregnancies in families that talked about and imposed AOUM. 100% of the girls in these families were NOT sexually active. 97% of the boys in these families were not sexually active. Extrapolation of my data showed 100% of all girls and 97% of all boys in this study were virgins when they married.


Let’s visit data compiled by those researchers who oppose AOUM policies. Their studies indicate average age of a young person in America has sex for first time is at age 17 and average age for marriage is between 27 to 30. Proponents of these studies claim they prove that AOUM education does not stop pregnancies among teenagers. Furthermore they go on to say, those AOUM programs do not result in teens avoiding sex or reduce teen pregnancy or STI’s.


According to CDC approximately 22 of every 1,000 American girls between ages of 15-19 years young become pregnant prior to marriage. Birthrate in 2015 for Hispanic teens was over twice as high as the rate for non-Hispanic white teens while birthrate for non-Hispanic Black teens was nearly twice the rate of non-Hispanic White teens.

My findings showed that out of nearly 5,000 Muslim American girls ages 13-26, ZERO PERCENT became pregnant prior to marriage. 100% of all girls were not sexually active. 100% of the girls had sex for the very first time on their wedding night. In other words ALL GIRLS in my study were virgins when they were married. 100% of the 1000 boys aged 13-18 were not sexually active. 5% of the 1000 boys aged 20-26 said they had sex with a girl who was not Muslim.


CDC statistics show over half of the 20 million new STI’s occur in adolescents aged 15-24. In 2016 approximately 21% of all new HIV cases in America occurred in children aged 13-14.

My findings showed STD’s and STI’s in children where parents discussed AOUM was ZERO PERCENT. HIV diagnoses in this group of boys and girls was ZERO PERCENT. The amount of federally funded money allocated to these families in their communities to teach AOUM education was ZERO dollars. So there you have it. No government intervention and you get amazing results. Family and faith will always “Trump” bureaucracy and government.

What makes these findings even more astounding is nearly 70% of children in my findings are 1st generation Americans. These family values regarding AOUM were part of their parents faith, culture and teachings inculcated back in the countries they immigrated from and these immigrant parents instilled those values in their 1st generation American children as they were growing up in America even though their children were being bombarded everyday by institutions and even their own friends sending them completely different messages.


Recently a tweet was sent out by PPAC UTAH @ppacutah which said “Parents. Give your teens reasons to come talk to you! Be involved! Did you know that every week nearly 4500 American teens ages 15-19 give birth? For more information on Planned Parenthood’s Families Talking Together program visit…”


Another tweet was sent out by Planned Parenthood Generation Act @PPGenAction. It read the following “Note to the Trump Administration. Abstinence only programs don’t work. Abstinence only programs have never worked. Abstinence only programs will never work.”

My research shows conclusively that studies by AOUM detractors are flawed and were never implemented properly because religious teachings, decency and moral concepts were never taught. Another reason why their AUOM programs never worked was they never involved the parents.


Now lets get to my findings and how I arrived at my conclusions based on the data collected. My collection of raw data was from 1985-2019. Over 3000+ families which breaks down to about 6,000+ parents and over 10,000 boys and girls in the communities I have lived in or visited of which are Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Illinois, Texas, Florida and North Carolina.


Of the 10,000+ children, girls constituted roughly 60% of sample size and boys were 40%. I then broke them down by age groups. Approximately 3,500 girls were in the age group of 13-19. 1,500 girls were in the 20-26 age group. Approximately 1,000 girls were in the age group 5-12 and were not part of the study. The boys were broken down as follows. 2,000 were in the 13-19 age group. 1,500 were in the 20-26 age group. The rest were in the age group 5-12 and were not part of the study.


The ethnicities of these American children was as follows:

70% were of Indian/Pakistani ethnicities and over 90% are American born.

20% were of Arab ethnicity and 70% are American born.

10% were of the rest of ethnicities listed below and 80% are American born.

The background of these families were of many ethnicities. Parents were all legal immigrants. Some were green card holders. Majority were American citizens. Approximately 70% of the children in the study were 1st generation American born. Parents were from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan, Bangladesh, Lebanon, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Indonesia, Turkey and Morocco. Over 70% of the families were of Indian/Pakistani ethnicity.


Nearly 80% of Indian/Pakistani families would be classified as upper middle class or above with an annual combined income over $150,000+. 10% of these families have an annual combined income between $75,000-$100,000. 10% would be below $75,000. Among those families of Arab ethnicity 25% would be considered upper middle class with combined annual income over $150,000+. 25% have combined income between $75,000-$100,000. 50% have income below $75,000. Among remaining ethnicities 10% would be considered upper middle class with combined annual incomes over $150,000+. 10% have annual combined income between $75,000-$100,000. 80% have annual combined income less than $75,000.


The commonality among all these families was that they are all traditional two parent homes and they are all Muslims. Average length of marriage of these immigrant parents is 26+ years. Another interesting factor was out of this population of 3,000+ families, I only knew of one family that was divorced. Those two parents never remarried but were very much involved in their children’s lives.


All questions in the study were asked in person either individually, at seminars and large gatherings. Quite often when invited to dinner parties which numbered in the thousands over the years I would ask these same questions and polled the results. The same questions were asked of both parents.


Following are the questions which were asked of parents:

Do you believe in pre-marital sex?

Fathers Yes 0% No 100%

Mothers Yes 0%. No 100%

Do you believe pre-marital sex is a sin?

Fathers Yes 100% No 0%

Mothers Yes 100% No 0%

Do you believe in the western culture of dating?

Fathers Yes 0% No 100%

Mothers Yes 0% No 100%

Do you allow your daughters to date?

Fathers Yes 0% No 100%

Mothers Yes 0% No 100%

Do you allow your sons to date?

Fathers Yes 0% No 100%

Mothers Yes 0% No 100%

Have you talked to your children and told them that sex before marriage is not an appropriate value in society?

Fathers Yes 100% No 0%

Mothers Yes 100% No 0%

Do you believe children at the age of 18 become independent of parents?

Fathers Yes 0% No 100%

Mothers Yes 0% No 100%

Would you ever allow your daughter to take birth control pills?

Fathers Yes 0% No 100%

Mothers Yes 0% No 100%


Girls and Boys aged 13-18


Have you ever been out on a date or dated?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 2%** No 98%


**These were boys ages 17-18 and girls the boys dated were girls who were not Muslim.

Do you believe in pre-marital sex?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 0% No 100%

Have you ever had sex?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 0% No 100%

Have you ever kissed or made out?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 2%** No 99%


**These were boys ages 17-18 and girls the boys kissed were not Muslim.

Did you ever have a boyfriend or girlfriend during middle or high school?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 1%** No 99%

**These were boys ages 17-18 and their girlfriends were not Muslim.

Girls and Boys aged 19-26


Have you ever been out on a date or dated?

Girls Yes 1%* No 99.%

Boys Yes 2%** No 98%


*Girls said they went out on a date with American Muslim boys. In the 11 cases of girls who dated American Muslim boys in college all were engaged to that boy prior to dating and all 11 got married to the boy they were dating. 2 of these marriages eventually ended up in divorce.


**Boys dated American Muslim girls as well as non-Muslim girls. Boys who went out with American Muslim girls were engaged to them prior to their going out and got married. 17 American Muslim boys married non-Muslim girls.


Do you believe in pre-marital sex?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 0% No 100%

Have you ever had sex?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 5%** No 95%


**Boys said they had sex with girls who they were dating or went out with and were not Muslim.

Have you ever kissed or made out?

Girls Yes 0% No 100%

Boys Yes 5%** No 95%

**Boys said they did with girls who were not Muslim.

Did you ever have a boyfriend or girlfriend during college or post college?

Girls Yes 5%* No 95%

Boys Yes 10%** No 90%

*Majority of girls boyfriends were Muslim and they were all engaged.

*7 girls were engaged to boys who were not Muslim but all seven boys converted to the Muslim faith prior to getting married.

**Boys said in cases where their girlfriend was Muslim, they were engaged.

**17 boys were engaged to girls who were not Muslim but all 17 girls converted to the Muslim faith prior to getting married.

Conclusions

1. These findings clearly demonstrate that Abstinence Only Until Marriage (AOUM) works in adolescents if implemented properly within a family oriented structure.

2. AOUM works regardless of economic stratification of families. The outcomes are similar whether these adolescent children come from lower, middle or upper income families.

3. AOUM works in traditional two parent families living in a community with similar family values

4. Religious values play a huge role in the implementation of AOUM.

5. An Intact nuclear family is crucial for AOUM

6. Presence of a father figure is absolutely critical for AOUM

0 views

© Dr. Nasir A. Shaikh

Paid for By The Committee to Elect Dr. Nasir Shaikh for Congress 2020